right after you were just called out on it.
Interesting that it involves homosexuality both times.
Also, very mature.
Thank you for proving my point. (see below)My opinion (not that it matters) is that SSR wheels are excellent wheels, and not THAT expensive. I also think that unless you require custom sizes and offsets (widebody) HRE wheels are probably overkill and are generally overrated. They are nice wheels of course, just a little too expensive for what you get, also my opinion - no one cares. It's rude to belittle other peoples things, just because you think yours are better (or because you paid more for yours). Its rude and immature. I'm very laid back, in fact, about the only thing that gets me going are cocky, arrogant jerks. Sorry bro.
Cheney, Edwards VP Debate 2004
Question 18 -- Without mentioning [the presidential candidates] by name, how are you different from the other vice presidential candidate?
IFILL: Mr. Vice President, picking up on that, you both just sang the praises of the tops of your ticket. Without mentioning them by name at all, explain to us why you are different from your opponent, starting with you, Mr. Vice President. CHENEY: Why I am different from John Edwards. Well, in some respects, I think, probably there are more similarities than there are differences in our personal story. I don't talk about myself very much, but I've heard Senator Edwards, and as I listen to him, I find some similarities. I come from relatively modest circumstances. My grandfather never even went to high school. I'm the first in my family to graduate from college. I carried a ticket in the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers for six years. I've been laid off, been hospitalized without health insurance. So I have some idea of the problems that people encounter. So I think the personal stories are, in some respects, surprisingly similar. With respect to how we've spent our careers, I obviously made a choice for public service. And I've been at it for a good long time now, except for those periods when we lost elections. And that goes with the turf, as well, too. I'm absolutely convinced that the threat we face now, the idea of a terrorist in the middle of one of our cities with a nuclear weapon, is very real and that we have to use extraordinary measures to deal with it. I feel very strongly that the significance of 9/11 cannot be underestimated. It forces us to think in new ways about strategy, about national security, about how we structure our forces and about how we use U.S. military power. Some people say we should wait until we are attacked before we use force. I would argue we've already been attacked. We lost more people on 9/11 than we lost at Pearl Harbor. And I'm a very strong advocate of a very aggressive policy of going after the terrorists and those who support terror. IFILL: Senator Edwards, you have 90 seconds. EDWARDS: Mr. Vice President, we were attacked. But we weren't attacked by Saddam Hussein. And one thing that John Kerry and I would agree with you about is that it is... IFILL: You just used John Kerry's name.
OK, you made a mistake and you were called out on it. Don't do it again.
EDWARDS: Oh, I'm sorry. I broke the rule. One thing that we agree about is the need to be offensive in going after terrorists. The reality is that the best defense is a good offense, which means leading -- America returning to its proud tradition of the last 75 years, of once again leading strong coalitions so we can get at these terrorist cells where they are, before they can do damage to us and to the American people. John Kerry made clear on Thursday night that -- I'm sorry, I broke the rules. We made clear -- we made clear on Thursday night that we will do that, and we will do it aggressively.
Now, you just look really stupid.
|
07:51:12 10/26/04
